Dear Evolutionary Process,
Teething is a design flaw. When you have a free minute, I implore you to review it and consider some changes. As much as I can appreciate the value of teeth and the role they have played in survival of the fittest, I fail to see the benefit of subjecting babies to the pain of 20 hard, sharp objects cutting through their tender gums during the first 2 years of life.
I’m not sure that babies being born with teeth is the answer, but I am sure that with your infinite creativity, you can come up with something that I cannot even imagine. However, if you decide that being born with teeth is the best option, I have some humble recommendations for you to consider:
- please have the in utero teething process painless (c’mon, I know you can do that).
- please consider our nipples. I am sure that mothers to come would appreciate a little extra protection, or decreased sensitivity, or something, if they will be nursing newborns with teeth.
I regret having to point out a flaw in our design, but I trust you will consider my humble request for the sake of infants yet to come.
Thank you for your time (and other things – like, opposing thumbs and bipedalism)
Sincerely,
Sarah
Dear Sarah,
While you have the attention of the Evolutionary Process, could you ask that the unproductive use of pain and distress for both mother and baby during labour be reconsidered?
Thank-you,
Nannidale
I second the letter, but I have one amendment… removing the part about the decreased sensitivity of the nipple. What? I have my own reasons, ok?